Apaya vs Sendible: Social Media Agency Tool Showdown

Sendible positioned itself as the agency social media solution. Apaya positioned itself as AI automation for everyone—including agencies. This Apaya vs Sendible comparison covers how traditional agency tools stack up against AI-powered content creation at scale.

Quick Verdict: Sendible offers robust agency features—white-label dashboards, client management, and multi-user permissions. Apaya offers AI content creation that eliminates the need for content staff. Choose Sendible if your agency model relies on human content creators. Choose Apaya if you want to scale clients without scaling headcount.

Try Apaya Free →

Comparison at a Glance

Feature Sendible Apaya
Content Creation ❌ Manual ✅ AI-generated
White-Label Dashboard ✅ Yes ⚠️ Limited
Client Management ✅ Excellent ✅ Multi-brand
Graphic Design ⚠️ Canva integration ✅ Built-in branded
Approval Workflows ✅ Yes ✅ Yes
Custom Reporting ✅ Strong ✅ Yes
Smart Queues ✅ Yes ✅ AI-optimized
Content Library ✅ Yes ✅ AI-managed
RSS Automation ✅ Yes ✅ Yes
Time Investment (per client) 5-10 hours/week 30 min/week

Pricing Comparison

Sendible Pricing

Plan Monthly Cost Users Profiles Key Features
Creator $29/mo 1 6 Basic scheduling
Traction $89/mo 4 24 Team features
White Label $240/mo 10 60 Full white-label
White Label+ $750/mo 100 300 Enterprise scale

Additional costs: Content creators (salary or contractor), design tools, stock photos. Per-client content creation time is the real expense.

Apaya Pricing

Plan Monthly Cost Brands Social Accounts What’s Included
Starter $39/mo 1 2 Full AI automation
Growth $79/mo 1 4 Full AI automation
Agency $415/mo 10 All Multi-brand management
Enterprise $832/mo 25 All Priority support

All-inclusive: AI content creation for all brands, branded graphics, scheduling.

The Agency Economics

Scenario Sendible + Staff Apaya Only
10 clients $240/mo + content staff $415/mo
Content staff (1 person) $3,500-5,000/mo $0
Total monthly cost $3,740-5,240/mo $415/mo
Clients per person 5-10 50+

Sendible’s tool cost is low. The labor cost is not.

Feature Breakdown

Content Creation

Sendible: Zero AI content generation. You or your team write every caption, create every graphic, research every hashtag for every client. Sendible manages what you create, doesn’t create for you.

Apaya: AI generates complete posts for each client brand—captions, hashtags, and graphics—based on each client’s website and brand voice. One person can manage content for 50+ clients.

Winner: Apaya. This is the fundamental difference for agency scalability.

Client Management

Sendible: Purpose-built for agencies. Client dashboards, permission levels, separated accounts, client-specific reporting. Mature multi-client architecture.

Apaya: Multi-brand management with brand isolation, separate brand frameworks, and per-brand content generation. Designed for agencies managing multiple distinct brands.

Winner: Sendible for traditional agency workflows, Apaya for AI-assisted management.

White-Label Capabilities

Sendible: Full white-label on higher tiers—custom domain, logo, colors, and client-facing dashboards. Clients see your brand, not Sendible’s.

Apaya: Limited white-label currently. Agencies work within Apaya’s interface, managing client brands internally.

Winner: Sendible for client-facing white-label.

Reporting & Analytics

Sendible: Strong custom reporting with white-label options. Create client-ready reports automatically. Export and schedule report delivery.

Apaya: Unified analytics with AI insights per brand. Less emphasis on client-facing reports, more on actionable optimization.

Winner: Sendible for client-facing reports, Apaya for automated optimization.

Smart Scheduling

Sendible: Smart queues that maintain posting frequency without manual scheduling. Set up once, posts flow automatically from your queue.

Apaya: AI-optimized scheduling that determines best times per brand’s specific audience. Automatically adapts based on engagement patterns.

Winner: Tie—different approaches to the same goal.

Content Library

Sendible: Shared content library across team and clients. Store, organize, and reuse content assets.

Apaya: AI-managed content with brand frameworks that inform continuous generation. Less emphasis on storing past content, more on creating new.

Winner: Sendible for asset libraries, Apaya for continuous creation.

Pros and Cons

Sendible Pros

  • ✅ Purpose-built for agency workflows
  • ✅ Full white-label capabilities
  • ✅ Strong client reporting features
  • ✅ Mature multi-client architecture
  • ✅ Canva integration for design
  • ✅ Lower tool cost

Sendible Cons

  • ❌ No content creation—agencies do all the work
  • ❌ Labor costs are the real expense
  • ❌ Each client requires dedicated content time
  • ❌ Scaling requires hiring
  • ❌ Margins squeezed by content creation costs

Apaya Pros

  • ✅ AI creates content for all clients
  • ✅ One person manages 50+ clients
  • ✅ Per-brand AI learning
  • ✅ Branded graphics included
  • ✅ Scales without hiring
  • ✅ Higher margins per client

Apaya Cons

  • ❌ Limited white-label currently
  • ❌ Less traditional agency workflow
  • ❌ Higher tool cost (but lower total cost)
  • ❌ Client reporting less robust
  • ❌ Newer platform

Who Should Choose Sendible

Sendible is ideal for:

  • Traditional agencies with content creation staff who need coordination tools
  • Agencies requiring white-label client dashboards
  • Teams where human content creation is part of the service offering
  • Agencies with established content workflows they want to optimize
  • Client relationships requiring transparent, white-labeled dashboards

You’ll succeed with Sendible if: You have content creators and need tools to manage their work across clients. The bottleneck is organization, not creation.

Who Should Choose Apaya

Apaya is ideal for:

  • Agencies wanting to scale clients without scaling staff
  • Freelancers building agency practices solo
  • Agencies where content creation is the bottleneck
  • New agencies without established content teams
  • Any agency wanting better margins through automation

You’ll succeed with Apaya if: You want to manage 50+ clients with minimal staff. Content creation is your constraint, not organization.

The Agency Business Model Question

This comparison is really about agency business models:

Traditional Agency Model (Sendible)

  • Bill clients for content creation
  • Hire content creators
  • Use tools like Sendible to coordinate
  • Margin limited by labor costs
  • Scale limited by hiring ability

AI-Powered Agency Model (Apaya)

  • Bill clients for social media management
  • AI creates content
  • Humans review, approve, handle strategy
  • Higher margins (less labor)
  • Scale limited by how many brands you can oversee

Neither model is wrong. But if labor costs are squeezing your margins or you want to scale without hiring, Apaya changes the equation.

Real Agency Comparison

Metric 10-Client Agency (Sendible) 10-Client Agency (Apaya)
Tool cost $240/mo $415/mo
Content staff needed 1-2 people 0 (oversight only)
Staff cost $4,000-8,000/mo $0
Total cost $4,240-8,240/mo $415/mo
Gross margin @ $500/client 17-42% 92%
Max clients (same staff) 10-20 50+

The numbers favor AI automation dramatically.

Migration: Switching from Sendible to Apaya

If you’re considering the transition:

  1. Start with one client as a test case
  2. Connect their website to Apaya for brand learning
  3. Compare AI output to your current content quality
  4. Calculate the math on your specific client load
  5. Transition clients gradually as you validate quality

You can run Sendible and Apaya in parallel during evaluation.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can Apaya match Sendible’s white-label features?

Currently, no. Sendible has more mature white-label capabilities. If client-facing dashboards are essential, this matters. Many agencies find internal management sufficient.

Will clients accept AI-generated content?

Most clients care about results, not process. AI-generated content that’s on-brand and performs well is indistinguishable from human-created content to end audiences.

What about client-specific strategies?

Apaya learns each brand separately. Each client has their own Brand Framework, voice, and content style. It’s not one-size-fits-all.

How does quality compare to human-created content?

After initial brand learning, most users approve 90%+ of AI content without edits. The AI learns what works for each brand specifically.

Can I still offer strategic services with Apaya?

Absolutely. Apaya handles content creation, not strategy. Many agencies use Apaya for production while focusing human time on strategy, client relationships, and high-value services.

Choosing the Right Path

Sendible is right for agencies with content creation staff who need sophisticated client management, white-label dashboards, and traditional agency workflows.

Apaya is right for agencies wanting to scale client count without scaling headcount—where AI content creation transforms the business model.

Agency Goal Choose
Coordinate existing content team Sendible
White-label client dashboards Sendible
Traditional agency workflows Sendible
Scale clients without hiring Apaya
Improve margins through automation Apaya
Manage 50+ clients efficiently Apaya

Ready to Transform Your Agency?

See what AI automation does for agency scalability.

Start Your Free Trial → | View Pricing →

No credit card required • Live in 5 minutes • Cancel anytime

More Comparisons

Researching other tools? See how Apaya compares:

Related Resources